![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
Ну тупыыыые(с)известно кто, или история с политической географией
"Putin has complained about the presence of what he said were too many Western warships in the Black Sea: one Polish, one Spanish, one German and two from the United States, which carried aid to Georgia’s Black Sea ports.
That appears to be under the limits of the 1936 Montreux Convention governing the use of the Black Sea by countries that do not border it. We have not heard Putin mention Montreux. (Turkey refused to let U.S. hospital ships enter the Black Sea on the grounds that they exceeded the Montreux tonnage limits. The United States never signed the convention but has promised to abide by it.)
This may not be Putin’s best argument. Russia keeps 40 warships in the Ukrainian Black Sea port of Sevastopol, and in the past has violated Montreux by sending aircraft carriers from the Black Sea to the Mediterranean. But it takes a realist to recognize effective arguments." (с)редакционный комментарий в "The Boston Herald"
Русский перевод есть на Иносми.
Я правильно понимаю, что на имеющихся в распоряжении газеты американских картах РФ не имеет выхода к Черному морю? ;)
That appears to be under the limits of the 1936 Montreux Convention governing the use of the Black Sea by countries that do not border it. We have not heard Putin mention Montreux. (Turkey refused to let U.S. hospital ships enter the Black Sea on the grounds that they exceeded the Montreux tonnage limits. The United States never signed the convention but has promised to abide by it.)
This may not be Putin’s best argument. Russia keeps 40 warships in the Ukrainian Black Sea port of Sevastopol, and in the past has violated Montreux by sending aircraft carriers from the Black Sea to the Mediterranean. But it takes a realist to recognize effective arguments." (с)редакционный комментарий в "The Boston Herald"
Русский перевод есть на Иносми.
Я правильно понимаю, что на имеющихся в распоряжении газеты американских картах РФ не имеет выхода к Черному морю? ;)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Кстати, причем тут "Тирпиц"? Если имелись ввиду "карманные линкоры" "Дойчланд", "Адмирал Шеер" и "Адмирал граф Шпее", то это скорее пример инженерной эквилибристики, поскольку они смогли уложиться в рамки ограничений Веррсальского договора. Вот с водоизмещением "Ямато" японцы смухлевали, это да.
no subject